Improving Student Achievement through Mastery Learning

Sunanda Jain, Nasrin. Nasrin.

Abstract


“Mastery-Learning proposes that all children can learn when provided with the appropriate learning condition in the class-room.” i.e. everyone can learn in the right circumstances, if the educators have enough knowledge and instructional strategy about mastery learning model. The mastery-learning model is suitable for education program for every student in schools. Mastery learning model can be adapted and applied to the program 

In order to realize one of the most important necessities of the life, which is learning, the human being spends most of their time for education-training activities. But every individual being a part of a group is dependent on a single program and an educational management which was chosen for the group by the teacher. However, each student has individual learning abilities, different from other members of the group. At the end of the teaching nearly all of the individuals of that group are expected to be successful. If they are not mastered any given unit, they can repeat it, unless & until they have mastered the material.

 Mastery learning is used in order to advance an individual’s potential for learning. Compared to traditional learning models, sufficient time, attention, and help are afforded to each student. This paper shows that by applying mastery learning as a teaching strategy, students achieve higher learning and better academic performance.  


Keywords


Mastery learning(ML), Individual differences, Learnin

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arlin, M. & Webster, J. (1983) “Time cost of ML.” Journal of Education Psychology, 75(2), pg 187-195.

Arlin, M. (1984). “Time, equality, and mastery learning”. Review of Educational Research, 54, pg 65-86.

Bloom, B. (1968). “Learning for mastery”. Evaluation Comment 1, 2, 1-5.

Bloom, B. S. (1968). “Learning for mastery”. In J.H. Block (Ed.). (1971).Mastery learning: Theory and Practice. New York: Rinehart Winston,Inc., pg.52.

Bloom, Hastings & Madaus (1971). “Handbook on formative & summative evalution of student learning”. New York; Mc Graw-Hill Book company.

Brophy, J.E, & Good, T.L (1986). “Teacher behaviour and student achievement”. In M.C Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pg 328_375). New York: Macmillan..

Budhdev, Preavina V.(1996) “ The attitudes of secondary school students towards various school subjects.” Cited in M.B Buch (Ed.) Sixth survey of Educational Research, Vol.II, pg 488-489.

Burns, R.B (1979) “Mastery learning: does it work?” Educational leadership, 37(1), pg 110-113.

Francis, Figl and savage, C. (2009) “Mastery learning in a large first year physics class.” University Science proceedings, pg 152-159.

Costa, A. Gramston, R. & Lambert, l. (1988) “Evaluation of teaching: The cognitive development view.” In Stanley & W. Propham, (Eds.) Teacher evaluation: six prescriptions for success. (pg 145-165). Alexandria VA: The Association for supervision and curriculum development (ERIC Document Reproduction service No. 2996833).

Gentile, J.R (1970) “A mastery strategy for introductory educational psychology.” Unpublished materials, State of New York at Buffalo, pg 181.

Guskey, T. & Gates, S. (1986) “synthesis of research on effects of Mastery learning in elementary & secondary classrooms.” Educational Leadership, 43(8), pg 73-80.

Hill-Miller, P. (2011) “Different approach, different results: A study of mastery learning instruction in a developmental reading class at an urban community college.” The University of North Carolina at Charlotte. ProQuest dissertations and theses, pg 120, retrieved from: http://search.Proquest.com/docview/897948393? Accountid= 28682. (897948393).

Hooda, R.C. (1982) “Effects of Mastery Learning Strategy (MLS) on pupil achievement.” Dept. of Edu. DAVV, (NCERT financed) Cited in M.B Buch (Ed.) Forth survey of Educational Research, Vol.I, pg 784.

Kazu, Kazu, H. & Ozdemir, O. (2005) “ The Effects of Mastery Learning Model on the success of the students Who Attended “Usage of Basic Information Technologies” Course , Educational technology & Society, 8(4), pg 233-243.

Kulik, C. Kulik, J. & Bangert- Drowns, R. (1990) “Effectiveness of ML programs: A Meta analysis.” Review of Educational Research, 60(2), pg 265-306.

Lancy, J.D (1996) “The effect of co-operative and mastery learning method on primary grade students learning and retention of economic concepts.” Early Education and Development, 7(2), 253-274.

Larsen and Janeen, J. (1987) “Teaching Basic Jazz Piano Skills A Mastery Learning Approach.” Paper presented at the annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association Distributed by ERIC clearinghouse. 1987. Washington, DC, April 20-24, 1987.

Mathur, R.G. (1988) “Effects of Mastery-level learning programme in statistics on the achievement, self-concept & attitude towards statistics of nursing students.” Ph.D Edu., Uni. Of Delhi. Cited in M.B Buch (Ed.) Fifth survey of Educational Research, Vol.I, and pg 442.

Okey, J. (1974) “Altering teacher & pupil behaviour with Mastery teaching.” School science & mathematics, 66, pg 530-535.

Rowe, J. (2010) “Does a mastery learning environment promote students’ intrinsic motivation for learning?” ( Caapella university) proquest Dissertations and Theses. Retrieved from http:// search. Proquest.com/docview/ 756899806? Accountid 28682(756899806).

Sadeghi, & Sadeghi, A. (2012) “Relevance of mastery learning (ML) in teaching of English (case study the university of guilan, Iran), Creative Education. 3(1), pg 41-44. Retrieved from

http://search.proquest.com/docview/963357375? Accountid=28682.

Slavin, R. E. (1987). Mastery learning reconsidered. Review of Educational Research, 57, 175-213.

Thomas, G.R.(1995) “Mastery learning in the regular class-room teaching exceptional children.” Journal of Educational Research, 21(1), pg 15-18.

Thankam, S.S. (1997) “Effects of Mastery learning on certain affective outcomes of mathematics learning.” Doctoral thesis, University of Kerala.

Vaidya, S. (1990) “Effects of mastery learning strategy on pupils’ achievement, their self concept &attitude towards Hindi.” Ph.D Education, Devi ahilya Viswavidyalaya, Cited in M.B Buch (Ed.) Fifth survey of Educational Research, Vol.II, pg 1431.

Vivekananda. {1996) “Education”. Kolkata: Sri Ramkrishna Mission Institute of culture. Pg-9.

Wambugu, and Changeiywo.(2006) “Effects of Mastery Learning Approach on Secondary school students’ Physics Achievement.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics. Science & Technology Education. 2008. 4(3), pg 293-302.

Weinert, F. E, & Helmke, A. (1995). “Learning from wise Mother nature or Big brother instructor: The wrong choice as seen from an educational perspective”. Educational Psychologist, 30(3), pg 135-142.

Wentling, T. (1973) “Mastery versus non-mastery instruction with varying tests item feedback treatments.” Journal of Educational psychology, 65(1), pg 50-58.

Zapico, S.C. (1991) “The quasi-mastery learning instructional system for community college chemistry.” University of central Florida, proquest Dissertations and Theses, pg 134, Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/303962051?accountid=28682.(303962051).

Zimmerman, B. J., & Didenedetto, M.K. (2008) “Mastery learning and assessment: Implications for students and teachers in an era of high-stakes testing”. Psychology in the Schools, 45 (3), pg 206-216.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.