Examining the influence of training design and employee self efficacy on training transfer: Empirical study of insurance sector
In a present complex and competitive scenario, organizations need to retain talented and competent employees who perform excellent work in a congenial environment. Insurance industries are taking necessary steps to improve and enhance the work force for achieving organizational success. The purpose of the research is to examine the positive and significant impact of training design and employee self efficacy on the training transfer in the context of insurance sector. Three variables were being examined, which includes training or transfer design, and self efficacy as an independent variable and transfer of training as a dependent variable. For this purpose data was collected from one hundred fifty employees from various two insurance companies in India especially Delhi through questionnaires. Data from target respondents was analyzed in the form of reliability analysis. Reliability test was applied to validate questionnaire. Multiple regression was applied to find the impact of independent variables on dependent variable. Findings of the study revealed that transfer design and self efficacy have a positive and significant impact on the transfer of training. Our study provides a refresh insight of the positive influence of training practices for increasing employees’ capabilities. This study has several managerial implications and directions for future research.
• Aguinis, H., and Kraiger, K. (2009). Benefits of Training and Development for Individuals and Teams, Organizations, and Society. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 451-474.
• Armstrong Michael. 2000. “Understanding training”, Human Resource Management Practice, 8th Edition. Kogan page limited, London. pp: 543.
• Arthur, W, Bennett, W, Edens, P & Bell, S 2003, Effectiveness of training in Organizations: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features‘Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88, pp234-245.
• Bates, R. A., Holton, E. F. III, Seyler, D. L. and Carvalho, M. A. (2000), ‘The role of interpersonal factors in the application of computer-based training in an industrial setting’, Human Resource Development International, 3, 19–42.
• Bhatti, M. A., & Kaur, S., (2010). The Role Individual and Training Design Factors on Training Transfer, Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 34 No. 7 pp. 656-672.
• Bramley, P. (2003). Evaluating Training (2nd ed.). CIPD UK
• Brown, T. C. and McCracken, M., (2009). Building a bridge of understanding: How barriers to training participation become barriers to training transfer, Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 33 No. 6 pp. 492-512.
• Colquitt, J, LePine, J & Noe, R (2000)b,Trainee attributes and attitudes revisited, a meta-analysis of research on training motivation‘ Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 85, no. 5, pp678–707, viewed 12 June, 2010, retrieved from Ebscohost Database
• Devos, C, Dumay, X, Bonami, M, Bates, R. & Holton, E 2007, The learning transfer system inventory (LTSI) translated into French, internal structure and predictive validity‘ International Journal of Training and Development, Vol. 11, no. 3, pp181-99, viewed 12 June, 2010, retrieved from Ebscohost Database.
• Facteau, J. D., Dobbins, G.H., Russell, J. E. A., Ladd, R. T., & Kudisch, J. D. (1995). The influence of general perceptions of the training environment on pretraining motivation and perceived training transfer. Journal of Management, 21, 1-25.
• Ginsberg, L.1997. “Training for the long haul”, Computer Shopper. Vol: 17, p:4.
• Gist, M. E., Stevens, C. K. and Bavetta, A. G. (1991), ‘Effects of self-efficacy and post-training intervention on the acquisition and maintenance of complex interpersonal skills’, Personnel Psychology, 44, 837–61.
• Godfrey, P 1999, Service-learning and management education‘ Journal of Management Inquiry, Vol. 84,
• Hill, T., Smith, N. D., & Mann, M. F. (1987). Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 307-313
• Holton, E. F. III (2005), ‘Holton’s evaluation model: new evidence and construct elaborations’, Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7, 37–54.
• Holton, E. F. III, Bates, R. A. and Ruona, W. E. A. (2000), ‘Development of a generalized learning transfer system inventory’, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11, 333–60.
• Holton, E, Bates, R, Bookter, A & Yamkovenko, V 2007, Convergent and divergent validity of the learning transfer system inventory‘ Human Resource Development Quarterly, Vol.18, no. 3, viewed 24 March, 2010, retrieved from Ebscohost Database
• Jones, G. R. (1986). Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers’ adjustments to organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 262-279.
• Karim Mohammaed Rejaul ,Huda Kazi Nazmul & Khan Rehnuma Sultana (2012) Significance of Training and Post Training Evaluation for Employee Effectiveness: An Empirical Study on Sainsbury’s Supermarket Ltd, UK International Journal of Business and Management; Vol. 7, No. 18; 2012.
• Kirkpatrick, D. L., and Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs: the four levels (3rd ed.). San Francisco, US: Berrett-Koehler.
• Latham, G. P. (1988). Human resource training and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 39, 545-482.
• Lee, J. (2010). Design of blended training for transfer into the workplace. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2).
• Loewenstein, M. A., & Speltzer, J. R. 1999. General and specific training: Evidence and implication. The Journal of Human Resources, 34(4): 710-733.
• Machin, M & Fogarty, G, 2003, Perceptions of training-related factors and personal variables as predictors of transfer implementation intentions‘Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol.18, no. 1, pp51-71.
• Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Salas, E. (1992), Influences of individual and situational characteristics on measures of training effectiveness, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 828-847.
• Mathieu, J. E., Martineau, J. W. and Tannenbaum, S. I. (1993), ‘individual and situational influences on the development of self-efficacy: implications for training effectiveness’, Personnel Psychology, 46, 125–47.
• Noe, R. A. (2002). Employee training and development (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Quinones, M. A. (1997), ‘Contextual influences on training effectiveness’, in M. A. Quinones and A. Ehrenstein (Eds), Training for a Rapidly Changing Workforce: Application of Psychological Research (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association), pp. 177–201.
• Ruona, W. E. A., Leimbach, M., Holton, E. F., and Bates, R. (2002). The relationship between learner utilityAffective reactions and predicted learning transfer among trainees. . International Journal of Training & Development, 6(4), 218-228.
• Schmidt Steven W (2009), Employee demographics and job training satisfaction: the relationship between dimensions of diversity and satisfaction with job training, Human Resource Development International, 12(3), pp 297-312.
• Tracey, J. B., Tannenbaum, S. I., and Kavanagh, M. J. (1995). Applying trained skills on the job: The importance of the work environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(2), 239-252.
• Tsaur, S.H., Lin, Y.C.2004. "Promoting service quality in tourist hotels: the role of HRM practices and service behaviour", Tourism Management, Vol. 25 pp.471.
• Van der Klink R.M. and Streumer J.N (2002) Effectiveness of On-the-Job Training. Journal of European Industrial Training 26/2/3/4 pp 196-199.
• Verma Dr.Shefali and Goyal Reeta (2011), A study of training in insurance and their impact on employees productivity, International Journal of Research in Economics and Social Sciences, Volume 1, Issue 1.
• Yamnill, S.; Mclean, G.N. (2001). Theories supporting transfer of training, Human Resource Development Quarterly. 12:195-208.
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.