BROADCAST POLITICAL INFORMATION THROUGH SOCIAL MEDIA AND EFFORTS TO INCREASE THE POLITICAL PARTICIPATION OF YOUNG VOTERS
Social media is certainly an instrument in providing direct information, engagement, and changes in civic participations. Social media is able to change the view as well as encouraging young people to become more actively involved as citizens, including participating in the election. Social media have become a new alternative to win the hearts of constituents through sharing opinions and ideas. This research aims to study the effects of exposure to social media content on the university students' knowledge of political information. Method used is survey research. Results of hypothesis testing states that political information in social media, menus available in social media that allow users to interact directly with the candidate, and allow users to participate actively, have a relationship with knowledge of political information on elections. Social media that have information about political actors, issues positions, and comparison issues between candidates' positions, voting records, campaign process, societal expectation, also have menus contact information, opportunity to become a member or volunteer, and the option of donation will produce cognitive effects for its users. Additionally, social media that have menus to make a public statement, participate in digital promotions, share links, write comments, leave a like or favorite symbols, and to encourage others to participate in the election process, can build knowledge of election-related political information and will ultimately encourage political participation.
Afifah, R. (2012, September 27). Pilkada DKI putaran kedua, golput Jakarta menurun. Kompas. Retrieved from http://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2012/09/27/14505319/ Pilkada.DKI.Putaran.Kedua.Golput.Jakarta.Menurun
Anvil Media. (2009). Resources: SEM glossary of terms. Retrieved from http://www.anvilmediainc.com/search-engine-marketing-glossary.html
Badan Akreditasi Nasional Perguruan Tinggi Indonesia (2013). Hasil akreditasi. Retrieved from http://ban-pt.kemdiknas.go.id/hasil-akreditasi/en/hasil-pencarian.php
Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. Boston: Yale University Press.
Bennett, L. (1998). The uncivil culture: Communication, identity, and the rise of lifestyle politics. PS: Political Sciences and Politics, 31(4), 740-761.
Bimber, B., & Davis, R. (2003). Campaigning online: The internet in US elections. New York: Oxford University Press.
Boulianne, S. (2009). Does internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Political Communication, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 193-211.
Carlisle, J. E., & Patton, R. C. (2013, Dec.). Is social media changing how we understand political engagement? An analysis of Facebook and the 2008 presidential election. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23612065
Carlson, T., & Strandberg, K. (2007). Finland: the European Parliament election in a candidate-centered electoral system. In Randolph Kluver, Nicholas W. Jankowski, Kirsten A. Foot & Steven M. Schneider (Eds.), The internet and national elections: A comparative study of web campaigning (pp. 29-42). New York: Routledge.
Cassel, C. A., & Lo, C. C. (1997). Theories of political literacy. Political Behavior, 19, 317-335.
Corrado, A., & Firestone, C. (1996). Elections in cyberspace: Toward a new era in American politics. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
Cutbirth, C. W., & Coombs, T. (1997, Nov.). The coming electronic democracy: The internet, political communication, and the duties of citizenship. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Convention, Chicago.
Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Drew, D., & Weaver, D. (2006). Voter learning in the 2004 presidential election: Did the media matter? Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 83(1), 25-42.
Drezner, D. W., and Farrel, H. (2007). Introduction: Blogs, politics and power. Public Choice, a special issue.
Flew, T. (2007). New media: An introduction (3rd ed.). Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Foot, K., & Schneider, S. (2006). Web campaigning. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Gong, R. (2011). Internet politics and state media control: Candidate weblogs in Malaysia. Sociological Perspectives, 54(3), 307-328. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/sop.2011.54.3.307
Grannovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
Haynes, A. A., & Pitts, B. (2009, Jan.). Making impression: New media in the 2008 presidential nomination campaigns. PS: Political Science and Politics, Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 53-58. Retrieved from http://www.jstor/org/stable/20452373
Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kahne, J., and Middaugh, E. (2012). Digital media shapes youth participation in politics. The Phi Delta Kappa, 94(3), 52-56. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41763677
Kenny, C. B. (1992). Political participation and effects from the social environment. American Journal of Political Science, 36(1), 259-267.
Kern, M. (1997). Social capital and citizen interpretation of political ads, news, and website information in the 1996 presidential elections. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 1238-1249.
Knoke, D. (1990). Political networks: The structural perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kompas.com. (2012, July 16). Hasil hitung cepat Pilkada DKI: Ada yang popular, ada yang berbenah. Retrieved from http://megapolitan.kompas.com/read/2012/07/ 16/11253159/Ada.yang.Populer.Ada.yang.Berbenah
Kotler, P. T., & Keller, K. L. (2006). Marketing Management (12th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education Limited.
Leighley, Jan E. (1990). Social interaction and contextual influences on political participation. American Politics Quarterly, 18(4), 459-475.
Loader, B. (2007). Young citizens in the digital age: Political engagement, young people and new media. London: Routledge.
McClurg, S. D. (2003). Social network and political participation: The role of social interaction in explaining political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 56(4), 449-464.
Mutz, D. C. (2002). Cross cutting networks: Testing democratic theory in practice. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 111-126.
Norris, Pippa. (2004). The bridging and bonding role of online communities. In P.N. Howard & S. Jones (Eds.), Society online: The internet in Context (pp. 31-41). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Palda, K. S. (1966). The hypothesis of a hierarchy of effects: A partial evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 3(1), 13-24.
Palfrey, T. R., & Poole, K. T. (1987). The relationship between information, ideology, and voting behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 31(3), 511-530.
Pavlik, J. V., & McIntosh, S. (2011). Converging media: A new introduction to mass communication (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Perlmutter, D. D. (2008). Scholar discusses new media in 2008 U.S. political campaign. Ask America. Retrieved from http://www.america.gov/st/washfile-english/2008/September/20080923170808xjsnommis0.8612787.html
Pinkleton, B. E., & Austin, E. W. (1998). Media and participation: Breaking the spiral of disaffection. In T. J. Johnson, C. E. Hays, and S. P. Hays (Eds.), Engaging the public: How the government and media can reinvigorate democracy (pp.77-86). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Potter, W. J. (2012). Media effects. New York: Sage Publication, Inc.
Prior, M. (2005, Jul.). News vs. entertainment: How increasing media choice widens gaps in political knowledge and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 577-592. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3647733
Simon, A. F. (1997). Television news and international earthquake relief. Journal of Communication, 47(3), 82-93.
Sindonews.com. (2012, August 17). Berebut pemilih pemula. Koran SINDO. Retrieved from http://metro.sindonews.com/read/666397/63/berebut-pemilih-pemula-
Sundar, S. S., Hesser, K. M., Kalyanaraman, S., & Brown J. (1998, July). The effect of website interactivity on political persuasion. Paper presented at the 21st General Assembly & Scientific Conference of the International Association for Media and Communication Research, Glasgow, UK.
The Electoral Commission of the Republic of Indonesia. (n.d). Sejarah Pemilu. Retrieved from http://www.kpu.go.id/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=43&Itemid=66
The Ministry of Communication and Information of the Republic of Indonesia. (2014, Feb. 18). Riset Kominfo dan UNICEF mengenai perilaku anak dan remaha dalam menggunakan internet (SIARAN PERS NO. 17/PIH/KOMINFO/02/2014). Jakarta, Indonesia.
The Official Site of Jakarta Capital City. (2011, March 9). About Jakarta. Retrieved from http://www.jakarta.go.id/eng/news/2011/03/jakartas-geography
Tolbert, C., & McNeal, R. (2003). Unraveling the effects of the internet on political participation. Political Research Quarterly, 56(2), 175-185.
Tsagarousianou, R. (1999). Electronic democracy: rhetoric and reality. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 24(2), 189–208.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wattenberg, M. P. (2008). Is voting for young people? With a postscript on citizen engagement. Singapore: Pearson Education, Inc.
Wiwoho, L. H. (2014, April 8). Antusiasme pemilih pemula. Kompas Siang. Retrieved from http://nasional.kompas.com/read/2014/04/08/1946582/Antusiasme.Pemilih.Muda
Wood, J. T. (2009). Communication in our lives (5th ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.
Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andoline, M., Jenkins, K., & Delli Carpini, M. (2006). A new engagement? Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. New York: Oxford University Press.
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.