Evaluation of the Frequency of Infertility in Males among Different Age Groups in Lahore

Ali Haider Aslam, Sahar Nabeel Akbar, Faisal Rana



Objective: Analyzing the frequency of infertility among the males of different age groups in Lahore.

Design of Study: Descriptive case study.

Place and Duration of Study: This study was carried out in the Urology department of Mayo hospital Lahore in a period of 6 months form July 2018 to December 2018.

Materials and Methods: Individuals in different age groups were selected randomly and then classified into three age groups. Patients with age between 20-30 years were classified as group-1, those with age between 20-30 years were kept in group-2 and patients having age greater than 40 years were kept in group-3. Only those patients were selected who were willing to take part in this research. Informed consent was taken from each individual. Patients were asked to provide the semen sample which was then analyzed using light microscopy. Each sample was carefully sent to a reliable lab for semen analysis. The reports were then analyzed for sperm motility, morphology, contamination with microbes and presence of any kind of debris.

Results: Aberrant semen report was surprisingly found in people of young age about 58% compare to people in group 2 and 3 having anomalous reports of 52% and 60%. Abnormal motility and morphology was highest in people above 40 years of age. According to the study a higher risk of aberration is seen in young age group. Vitiate foods, climate changes, improper nutrition and change of life style are the main reasons behind this increasing abnormality.

Conclusion: The increasing abnormal reports is an alarming condition that is causing increased infertility in young generation and a proper solution must be found out to prevent the infertility in coming generations.

Full Text:



BA., K., 2006. Within and between-subject variation in semen parameters in infertile men and normal semen donors.. Fertil Steril. , Volume 85, pp. 128-134.

Bujan L, M. A. P. F. M. R., 1996. Time series analysis of sperm concentration in fertile men in Toulouse, France between 1977 and 1992.. BMJ, Volume 312, pp. 471-2.

Carlsen E, G. A. K. N. S. N., 1992. Evidence for decreasing quality of semen during the past 50 years.. BMJ , Volume 305, pp. 609-13.

Christensen PC, L. H. L.-J. H., 2005. Implementation of flow cytometry for quality control in four danish bull studs.. Anim Reprod Sci , Volume 85, pp. 202-8.

Cooper TG, N. E. v. E. S. e. a., 2010. World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics.. Hum Reprod Update, 16(3), pp. 231-245.

Esteves SC, Z. A. A. N. A. J. S. E. A. A., 2012. Critical Appraisal of World Health Organization's New Reference Values for Human Semen Characteristics and Effect on Diagnosis and Treatment of Subfertile Men.. Urol , Volume 79, pp. 16-22.

Fisch H, G. E., 1996. Geographic variations in sperm counts: a potential cause of bias in studies of semen quality.. Fertil Steril, Volume 65, pp. 1044-6.

Glazener CM, C. C. L. P. e. a., 1987. The value of artificial insemination with husband’s semen in infertility due to failure of postcoital sperm-mucus penetration - controlled trial of treatment.. Br J Obstet Gynaecol , Volume 94, pp. 774-778.

Gohel K, J. A. S. S. G. S. S. R. D. M., 2014. Bacteriological profile and drug resistance patterns of blood culture isolates in a tertiary care nephrourology teaching institute.. Bio Med Res Int, p. 5.

Hamamah, S. F. A. L. J., 1997. The effect of male factors in repeated spontaneous abortion: Lesson from in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection.. Hum Reprod Update, Volume 3, pp. 393-400.

Homan GF, D. M. N. R., 2007. The impact of lifestyle factors on reproductive performance in the general population and those undergoing infertility treatment: a review.. Hum Reprod Update, Volume 13, pp. 209-23.

Irvine S, C. E. R. D. M. E. A. J., 1996. Evidence of deteriorating semen quality in the United Kingdom: birth cohort study in 577 men in Scotland over 11 years.. BMJ, Volume 312, pp. 467-71.

Nieschlag E, L. U. F. L. K. W. E., 1982. Reproductive functions in young fathers and grandfathers.. J Clin Endocrinol Metabol , Volume 55, pp. 676-81.

Paulsen CA, B. N. C., 1996. Data from men in greater Seattle area reveals no downward trend in semen quality: further evidence that deterioration of semen quality is not geographically uniform.. Fertil Steril, Volume 65, pp. 1015-20.

SE., L., 2007. Is sperm evaluation useful in predicting human fertility?. Reproduction , Volume 134, pp. 31-40.

SH., S., 2006. Does our environment affect our fertility? Some examples to help reframe the question.. Semin Reprod Med, Volume 24, pp. 142-6.

SH., S., 2006. Semen quality in fertile US men in relation to geographical area and pesticide exposure.. Int J Androl, Volume 29, pp. 62-68.

Sharlip ID, J. J. B. A. L. L. S. M. T. A. e. a., 2002. Best practice policies for male infertility.. Fertil Steril , Volume 77, pp. 873-82.

Swan SH, B. C. D. E. L. F. K. R. H. M. e. a., 2003. Geographic differences in semen quality of fertile U.S. males.. Environ Health Perspect , Volume 111, pp. 414-20.

Tielemans E, B. A. t. V. E. W. R. v. K. R. V. H. e. a., 1999. Occupationally related exposures and reduced semen quality: a case-control study.. Fertil Steril, Volume 71, pp. 690-6.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.