Unity of Sentential Meaning: Bhartṛhari's Approach to the Indivisibility Thesis

Rohana Seneviratne

Abstract


A doyen of profound discussions on the Indian philosophy of language, Bhartṛhari (fl. 500 – 700 CE) introduced in the light of the Advaita Vedanta system of philosophy a major theory known as the indivisibility thesis (akhaṇḍapakṣavāda) of meaning. His expertise in Sanskrit grammar rooted in the time-honored tradition bolstered with applied approach to the language in use enabled him to establish firmly this theory. Some later grammarians in the mainstream Pāṇinian grammatical tradition and Vedantic philosophers modelled their theories on Bhartṛhari's approach to sentential meaning, while some others criticized him for misusing the Advaita Vedantic theology and its standard line of arguments in order to justify the indivisibility of meaning, whereas primacy of words cannot be ascertained in any context of language use. This paper examines the background of Bhartṛhari's arguments for the legitimacy of his claim that sentence meaning is the primary entity, which is divisible neither syntactically nor semantically. It also seeks to justify that his approach to the indivisibility thesis deserves a significant position among the early thoughts on the derivation of meaning and its composition.


Keywords


sentential Meaning, Bhartṛhari, indivisibility thesis (akhaṇḍapakṣavāda), Sanskrit grammar, Indian philosophy of language

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aklujkar, A. (2001). The word is the world: Nondualism in Indian philosophy of language. Philosophy East and West, 51 (4), 452 - 473

Bhattacharya, S. (2002). Word and sentence: two perspectives: Bhartṛhari and Wittgenstein. New Delhi: Sāhitya Akademi.

Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York: Henry Holt.

Chatterjee, K. N. (ed. & tr.).(1982). The Tarkakaumudī of Laugākṣibhāskara. Varanasi: Chaukhamba Amarabharati Prakashan.

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. Mouton: The Hague.

Coward, H. G. & Raja, K. K. (eds.) (1990). Encyclopedia of Indian philosophies, Vol. V: The philosophy of the grammarians. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

Ganeri, J. (2001). Philosophy in classical India: proper work of reason. New York: Routledge.

Gaskin, R. (2008). The unity of the proposition. New York: Oxford University Press.

Grimes, J. A. (1989). A concise dictionary of Indian philosophy: Sanskrit terms defined in English. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.

Hirst, D. & Cristo, A. D. (1998). Intonation systems: a survey of twenty languages. Cambridge, U.K. ; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Houben, J. E. M. (1995). The Sambandha-samuddeśa (chapter on relation) and Bhartṛhari's philosophy of language. Gonda Indological Series, 2. Groningen: Egbert Forste.

Iyer, K. A. S. (1969). Bhartṛhari: A study of Vākyapadīya in the light of ancient commentaries. Deccan College Building Centenary and Silver Jubilee Series, 68. Pune: Deccan College Postgraduate Research Institute.

Iyer, K. A. S. (1982). The Vākyapadīya: some problems. Postgraduate and Research Department Series, no. 14. Poona, India: Bhāṇḍārkar Oriental Research Institute.

Iyer, K. A. S. (ed.) (1983). The Vākyapadīya of Bhartṛhari: Containing the Ṭīkā of Puṇyarāja and the ancient Vṛtti, (with a foreword by Ashok Aklujkar), Kāṇḍa II. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

Kelly, L. G. (2002). The mirror of grammar: Theology, philosophy, and the Modistae. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Mahavir (1984). Samartha theory of Pāṇini and sentence derivation. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.

Matilal. B. K. (1968). The Navya-Nyāya doctrine of negation: The semantics and ontology of negative statements in Navya-Nyāya philosophy. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Matilal, B.K. & Sen, P. K. (1988). The context principle and some Indian controversies over meaning. Mind (New Series), 97 (385), 73-97.

Matilal, B.K. (1990). The word and the world, India's contribution to the study of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Miśra, G. (1972). What is right and wrong in and about Śaṅkara-Vedānta. Calcutta Review, 3(4), 321-322.

Paranjape, S. M. (ed.) (2005). Tarkabhāṣā of Śri Keśavamiśra (with the commentary Prakāśa of Govardhana). Benares: Chaukhamba Sanskrit Pratisthan.

Patnaik, T. (1994). Śabda: A study of Bhartṛhari’s philosophy of language. New Delhi: DK Printworld.

Pokorny, J. (1959). Indogermanisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Bern: Francke Verlag.

Raja, K. K. (1969). Indian theories of meaning. Adyar: The Adyar Library and Research Centre.

Śarmā, R. N. (1990). Verbal knowledge in Prābhākara-Mīmāṁsā. Sri Garib Dass Oriental Series, No. 60. Delhi, India: Sri Satguru Publications.

Śāstrī, G. B. (1959). The philosophy of word and meaning: Some Indian approaches with special reference to the philosophy of Bhartṛhari. Calcutta: Calcutta Sanskrit College.

Śāstrī, G. B. (1980). A study in the dialectics of Sphoṭa. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

Singh, N. K. (1997-2001). Encyclopedia of Hinduism. New Delhi: Centre for International Religious Studies, Anmol Publications.

Strawson, P. F. (1992). Analysis and metaphysics: An introduction to philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tesniere, L. (1959). Elements de syntaxe structurale. Paris: Klincksieck.

Tripati, A. K. & Bhandare, I. S. (eds.) (1974). Tarkasaṅgraha of Annambhaṭṭa. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

Worthington, V. (1982). A history of yoga. London; Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.