Theorizing Feminist Research in Rural Areas of the Punjab, Pakistan

Abubakar Nazeer Choudhry

Abstract


This paper constructed on former work by the authors and on the succeeding literature. It argues that a feminist research provides a powerful tool in assisting us to understand women’s lives, their experiences, their concerns based on gender discrimination.This paper seek for empowerment and liberation of women by conceptualizing and thinking about  the findings of feminist researchs which are often applied to promote social changes and social justice for women.The paper begins by outlining why the theorization of term ‘feminist methodology’ is used to tag an ideal approach for conducting feminist research which reveals that the basic premise of feminist theory is that women have been excluded from traditional philosophy. In Pakistan, especially in Punjab, women inferior and subordinated status is in practice, including women’s political deprived affiliation to contest election and cast the vote. Such circumstances tend to make them less empowered. In addition, the relational analyses of liberal feminism and ethnographic structure of the Punjabi society shows a strong correlation that justifies the position of researchers to select a liberal feminist theory as a theoretical framework.The only way to bring changes in such traditional societies are gradual process of reforms. So, strategies of liberal feminists can be more successful as reformists rather than radicals, socialists and Marxists. 


Keywords


Feminist Research; Liberal feminists; Radical feminists; Marxist feminists; socialist feminists; women empowerment; Punjab

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abrar-ul-haq, M., Jali, M. R. M., & Islam, G. M. N. (2016). Empowering rural women in Pakistan: empirical evidence from Southern Punjab. Quality and Quantity, 51(4), 1777–1787.

Adeel, M., Yeh, A. G. O., & Zhang, F. (2017). Gender inequality in mobility and mode choice in Pakistan. Transportation, 44(6), 1519–1534.

Baehr, & Amy, R. (2013). Liberal Feminism. In The Stanford Encyclopedia (Fall 2018).

Batool, S. S., & Batool, S. A. (2018). Levels of Education , Age , Legal Awareness and Women Empowerment. Journal of Research and Reflections in Education, 12(2), 1–19.

Borland, K. (1991). “That’s not what I said”: Interpretive conflict in oral narrative research. In S. B. Gluck & D. Patai (Eds.), Women’s words: The feminist practice of oral history (pp. 63–75). London: Routledge.

Brake, E. (2004). Rawls and Feminism: What Should Feminists Make of Liberal Neutrality? Journal of Moral Philosophy, 1(3), 293–309.

Brison, S. J. (2018). One Outliving Oneself Trauma, Memory, and Personal Identity. In In Feminists Rethink The Self (pp. 12–39). Routledge.

Butt, B. I., & Asad, A. Z. (2016a). Refutation , Relinquishment and Inheritance : Exploring Women ’ s Inheritance Rights in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 36(2), 1001–1009.

Butt, B. I., & Asad, A. Z. (2016b). Social Policy and Women Status in Pakistan: A Situation Analysis. Orient Research Journal of Social Sciences, 1(1), 47–62.

Chambers, C. (2008). Sex, Culture, and Justice: The Limits of Choice. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Choudhry, A. N., Mutalib, R. A., & Ismail, N. S. A. (2019). Socio-Cultural factors affecting Women Economic Empowerment in Pakistan : A Situation Analysis. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(5), 90–102.

Code, L. (2000). Encyclopedia of Feminist Theories (pp. 15–40). Routledge.

Corea, G. (1986). The mother machine: Reproductive technologies from artificial insemination to artificial wombs. MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 11(5), 357–363.

Cosgrove, L., & Mchugh, M. C. (2000). Speaking for ourselves: Feminist methods and community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 28(6), 815–838.

Cudd, A. (2006). Analyzing Oppression. New York: Oxford University Press.

Daly, M. (2016). Gyn/ecology: The metaethics of radical feminism. Beacon Press.

Engels, F. (1884). The origin of the family, private property and the state. English Ed-1902.

Foord, J., & Gregson, N. (1986). Patriarchy: towards a reconceptualisation. Antipode, 18(2), 186–211.

Hays, S. (2003). Flat Broke with Children. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Leavy, P. L. (2006). Feminist research practice: a primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publication, Inc.

Ishaq, W., & Memon, S. Q. (2016). Roles of women in agriculture : A case study of rural Lahore. Journal of Rural Development and Agriculture, 1(1), 1–11.

Jamal, A. (2016). Why He Won’t Send His Daughter to School—Barriers to Girls’ Education in Northwest Pakistan. SAGE Open, 6(3).

Kemp, S., & Squires, J. (1997). Feminisms. Oxford University Press, Oxford UK.

Khurshid, A. (2016). Domesticated gender (in) equality: Women’s education & gender relations among rural communities in Pakistan. International Journal of Educational Development, 51, 43–50.

Lengermann, P. M., & Niebrugge, G. (2008). Contemporary Feminist Theory. In G. Ritzer (Ed.), Sociological Theory (8th ed., pp. 454–498). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Letherby, G. (2003). Feminist research in theory and practice. Open University Press, Philadelphia, USA.

Lewis, D. (2007). Feminism and the radical imagination. Agenda, 21(72), 18–31.

McDowell, L. (2008). The new economy, class condescension and caring labour: Changing formations of class and gender. NORA - Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 16(3), 150–165.

Miller, N. K. (2007). Out of the Family : Generations of Women in Marjane Satrapi ’ s Persepolis. Life Writing, 4(1), 37–41.

Moghadam, V. M. (1992). Development and women’ s emancipation: is there a connection? Development and Change, 23(3), 215–255.

Murshid, N. S., & Critelli, F. M. (2017). Empowerment and Intimate Partner Violence in Pakistan. Journal of Interpersonal Violence.

Nardi, P. M., & Schneider, B. E. (Eds.). (1998). Social perspectives in lesbian and gay studies, a reader. Routledge.

Nehere, K. P. (2016). The Feminist Views: A Review. Feminist Research, 1(1), 3–20.

Pomeroy, E. C., Holleran, L. K., & Kiam, R. (2004). Postmodern feminism : a theoretical framework for a field unit with women in jail. Social Work Education, 23(1), 39–49.

Qaisrani, A., Liaquat, S., & Khokhar, E. N. (2016). Socio-economic and Cultural Factors of Violence against Women in Pakistan (No. 158). Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI), Islamabad.

Rafay, B., Habib, B., Tariq, U., & Asghar Ali, A. (2016). Analysis on the Social Legislation and Women Empowerment in Pakistan: Comparative study of Democratic governments and Dictatorship periods (1947-2012). Journal of the Research Society of Pakistan, 53(1), 13–26.

Risman, B. J. (2004). Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism. Gender and Society, 18(4), 429–450.

Sasaquat, M. B., & Sheikh, Q. A. (2011). Employment Situation of Women in Pakistan. International Journal of Social Economics, 38(2), 98–111.

Smulders, A. E. M. (1998). Creating Space for Women: Gender-linked factors in Managing Staff in Higher Education Institutions. Improving the managerial effectiveness of higher education institutions. Paris.

Steil, J. M. I. (1997). Marital equality: Its relationship to the well-being of husbands and wives. Sage Publications, Inc.

Tong, R. (2001). Feminist Theory. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 5484–5491).

Tong, Rosemarie. (2018). Feminist Thoughts, Student Economy Edition: A More Comprehensive Introduction. Routledge.

Trebilcot, J. (1984). Mothering: Essays in feminist theory. Rowman & Littlefield Pub Inc.

Vance, C. S. (Ed.). (1984). Pleasure and danger: Exploring female sexuality. Boston: Routledge.

Vetterling-Braggin, M. (Ed.). (1982). “ Femininity,”" masculinity," and" androgyny": a modern philosophical discussion. Rowman & Littlefield.

Waterman, P. (1993). Hidden from Herstory: Women, Feminism and New Global Solidarity Vol. 28, No. 44 (Oct. 30, 1993), pp. WS83-WS100.

Economic and Political Weekly, 28(44), WS83–WS100.

WEF. (2018). The Global Gender Gap Report 2018. World Economic Forum (Vol. 25). Geneva: World Economic Forum.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.