An Innovative Approach in Decision-making Environments: Assessing Performance by Applying Multi-attribute Value Theory (MAVT)

Abbas Jaffar

Abstract


This paper describes the main components of Multi-Attribute Value Theory (MAVT), a recommendation for assessing and evaluating the objects which can be accredited as an evaluation procedure to a decision maker when calculating the stakeholders’ interests. Some certain rules are recommended for the application of MAVT for decision-making to be in use for forthcoming actions. The MAVT determines to state the decision maker’s general evaluation of an option in terms of the value of its performance on each distinctive criteria. This study reveals the application of Swing Technique, Midpoints Analysis and Simple Additive Weighting Model (SAW) which is widely accepted approach in decision-making process of multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA). How stakeholders’ preference and interests are changed after consideration and application of MAVT method and in which capacity results are consensus-oriented for decision-making procedure. This study defines the probable reasons to achieve the recommendations for further application of MAVT method in decision-making environments.


Keywords


Swing Methods, Midpoints Analysis, Simple Additive Weighting, Stakeholders Involvement, Evaluation Scheme, Multi-Attribute Value Theory (MAVT)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ananda, J., & Herath, G. (2009). A critical review of multi-criteria decision making methods with special reference to forest management and planning. Ecological Economics, 68(10), 2535-2548. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.05.010

Anderson David R., S. D. J., Williams Thomas A. , Camm Jeffrey D. , Martin Kipp. (2012). An Introduction to Management Science: Quantitative Approaches to Decision (J. W. Calhoun Ed. 13 ed. Vol. 13). South-Western Cengage Learning 5191 Natorp Boulevard Mason, OH 45040 USA: Joe Sabatino.

Chen, T.-Y. (2013). An interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy LINMAP method with inclusion comparison possibilities and hybrid averaging operations for multiple criteria group decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 45(0), 134-146. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2013.02.012

Chen, Y., Kilgour, D. M., & Hipel, K. W. (2008). Screening in multiple criteria decision analysis. Decision Support Systems, 45(2), 278-290. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.12.017

Davis, K. (2014). Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 189-201. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.02.006

Ferretti, V., Bottero, M., & Mondini, G. (2014). Decision making and cultural heritage: An application of the Multi-Attribute Value Theory for the reuse of historical buildings. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 15(6), 644-655. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2013.12.007

Goodwin Paul , W. G. (2004). Decision Analysis for Management Judgment (Wiley Ed. 3rd ed.). The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Jiménez, A., Mateos, A., & Sabio, P. (2013). Dominance intensity measure within fuzzy weight oriented MAUT: An application. Omega, 41(2), 397-405. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2012.03.004

Keeney, R. (1996). Value-focused thinking: Identifying decision opportunities and creating alternatives. . European Journal of Operational Research, 92(3), 537-549.

Kellon, D., & Arvai, J. (2011). Five propositions for improving decision making about the environment in developing communities: Insights from the decision sciences. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(3), 363-371. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.010

L., K. R. (1992). Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Liou, J. J. H., Tsai, C.-Y., Lin, R.-H., & Tzeng, G.-H. (2011). A modified VIKOR multiple-criteria decision method for improving domestic airlines service quality. Journal of Air Transport Management, 17(2), 57-61. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2010.03.004

Liu, P., Jin, F., Zhang, X., Su, Y., & Wang, M. (2011). Research on the multi-attribute decision-making under risk with interval probability based on prospect theory and the uncertain linguistic variables. Knowledge-Based Systems, 24(4), 554-561. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2011.01.010

Qun Zhang, M. I., Muhammad Aamir Obaid Khattak, Abbas Jaffar, Xiaoning Zhu, Muhammad Sanaullah Shah. (2012). Critical Success Factors for Successful Lean Six Sigma Implementation in Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 4(1), 118-124.

Raiffa, H. (1982). The Art and Science of Negotiation (1st ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Samaras, G. D., Matsatsinis, N. F., & Zopounidis, C. (2008). A multicriteria DSS for stock evaluation using fundamental analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 187(3), 1380-1401. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.09.020

Stefanopoulos, K., Yang, H., Gemitzi, A., & Tsagarakis, K. P. (2014). Application of the Multi-Attribute Value Theory for engaging stakeholders in groundwater protection in the Vosvozis catchment in Greece. Science of The Total Environment, 470–471(0), 26-33. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.09.008

Thokala, P., & Duenas, A. (2012). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Technology Assessment. Value in Health, 15(8), 1172-1181. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2012.06.015

von Winterfeldt, D., & Fasolo, B. (2009). Structuring decision problems: A case study and reflections for practitioners. European Journal of Operational Research, 199(3), 857-866. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.063


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.